Advances in the Standards & Applied Sciences

Advances in the Standards & Applied Sciences

Scenario-Based Life-Cycle Carbon Footprint Screening of Seawater Desalination Options for Bandar Lengeh (Persian Gulf): An ISO 14040/14044 Assessment and Monitoring Framework

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Standard administration of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
2 Standard Administration of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
3 Department of Biology, Payame Noor University, PO BOX ۱۹۳۹۵-۳۶۹۷ Tehran, IRAN
10.22034/asas.2026.594105.1116
Abstract
In coastal and arid regions experiencing severe water stress, seawater desalination serves as a critical infrastructure for freshwater supply. However, its high energy demand, particularly in hot and saline coastal regions such as the Persian Gulf, requires continuous energy and environmental monitoring. This study presents a scenario-based screening framework for evaluating the life-cycle global warming potential (GWP) and energy-related performance of desalination options for Bandar Lengeh, structured in accordance with the principles of ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Using the production of 1 m3 of potable freshwater as the functional unit, a cradle-to-grave screening assessment was conducted based on regional operational parameters, energy statistics, and literature-derived inventory ranges. The screening confirms that under fossil-fuel-dominated power regimes, the operational stage accounts for the vast majority of carbon emissions (typically accounting for approximately 85–90% of total life-cycle emissions), making specific energy consumption (SEC) and grid carbon intensity the key determinants of global warming impact. Under the defined functional unit, system boundaries, energy conditions, and reference assumptions, the RO scenarios show a lower screening carbon footprint than the MED and MSF scenarios. Solar-based pathways and broader renewable-electricity scenarios, including wind-based low-carbon electricity assumptions, are estimated to reduce operational emissions under the defined assumptions; however, downstream life-cycle burdens, such as chemical consumption and equipment manufacturing, become proportionally more important. Finally, an operational monitoring matrix featuring actionable Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), baseline thresholds, and monitoring frequencies is proposed to support low-carbon operational decision-making in Bandar Lengeh and comparable Persian Gulf facilities.
Keywords
Subjects

[1] Elimelech M, Phillip WA. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. science. 2011 Aug 5;333(6043):712-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200488
[2] Lawler W, Bradford-Hartke Z, Cran MJ, Duke M, Leslie G, Ladewig BP, Le-Clech P. Towards new opportunities for reuse, recycling and disposal of used reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination. 2012 Aug 1;299:103-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.030
[3] Raluy RG, Serra L, Uche J. Life cycle assessment of water production technologies-part 1: life cycle assessment of different commercial desalination technologies (MSF, MED, RO)(9 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2005 Jul;10(4):285-93. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.09.179.1
[4] Zhou J, Chang VW-C, Fane AG. Life Cycle Assessment for desalination: A review on methodology feasibility and reliability. Water Research. 2014;61:210- 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.017
[5] ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework.
[6] ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Requirements and guidelines.
[7] Nathan T. Hancock, Nathan D. Black, Tzahi Y. Cath, A comparative life cycle assessment of hybrid osmotic dilution desalination and established seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation processes, Water Research, 2012, 46, 1145-1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.004
[8] Al-Karaghouli A, Kazmerski LL. Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013 Aug 1; 24: 343-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.064
[9] Panagopoulos A. Assessing the Energy Footprint of Desalination Technologies and Minimal/Zero Liquid Discharge (MLD/ZLD) Systems for Sustainable Water Protection via Renewable Energy Integration. Energies. 2025; 18(4):962. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18040962
[10] Ministry of Energy of Iran. Energy balance sheet of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2021-2022). Deputy of Electricity and Energy, Tehran, Iran, Tech. Rep. 2023.
[11] Elazab MA, Abueldahab H, Elgohr A, Elhadidy SM. A comprehensive review on hybridization in sustainable desalination systems. Journal of Engineering Research. 2023;7:89-99. https://doi.org/10.21608/erjeng.2023.235480.1238
[12] Weisser D. A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies. Energy. 2007 Sep 1;32(9):1543-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.008
[13] Raluy RG, Serra L, Uche J. Life cycle assessment of desalination technologies integrated with renewable energies. Desalination. 2005 Nov 1;183(1-3):81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.023
[14] Lyons E, Zhang P, Benn T, Sharif F, Li K, Crittenden J, Costanza M, Chen YS. Life cycle assessment of three water supply systems: importation, reclamation and desalination. Water science and technology: water supply. 2009 Oct 1;9(4):439-48. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2009.534